PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSGRX vs. USHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Growth Fund (RSGRX) and USAA High Income Fund (USHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSGRX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than USHYX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, RSGRX has outperformed USHYX with an annualized return of 15.91%, while USHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.04% annualized return.


RSGRX

1D
-1.39%
1M
5.36%
YTD
8.35%
6M
7.42%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
15.91%

USHYX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSGRX
Victory RS Growth Fund
8.35%18.04%34.38%44.65%-33.32%19.64%35.74%29.83%-7.06%31.76%
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
1.10%7.22%6.85%13.05%-10.95%5.61%3.74%13.13%-3.52%7.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RSGRX and USHYX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1999

0.32

Over the past year, RSGRX and USHYX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSGRX vs. USHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSGRX
RSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

USHYX
USHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Growth Fund (RSGRX) and USAA High Income Fund (USHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSGRXUSHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.53

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.82

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

14.32

-8.70

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the USHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSGRX and USHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSGRXUSHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.41

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.92

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.30

-0.78

Drawdowns

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSGRX drawdown since its inception was -60.95%, which is greater than USHYX's maximum drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSGRX and USHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSGRXUSHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.95%

-33.59%

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-2.21%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-3.75%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.29%

-15.10%

-25.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-24.55%

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.29%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-2.97%

-11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

0.43%

+4.27%

Volatility

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Growth Fund (RSGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) at 0.79%. This indicates that RSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSGRXUSHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

0.79%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

2.14%

+10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

2.58%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.24%

4.60%

+18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

5.47%

+16.97%

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSGRX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than USHYX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSGRX vs. USHYX - Dividend Comparison

RSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than USHYX's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSGRX
Victory RS Growth Fund
4.84%5.25%7.52%0.15%2.33%9.08%9.19%10.65%16.93%5.16%8.44%7.02%
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
6.98%5.48%7.65%7.15%5.89%4.83%5.23%5.78%6.31%5.72%5.91%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSGRX and USHYX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSGRX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to USHYX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSGRX dropped -60.95% vs USHYX's -33.59%.

USHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSGRX and USHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer