RSG vs. TXRH
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and TXRH (Texas Roadhouse, Inc.) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while TXRH operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.42%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for TXRH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly lower than TXRH's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has outperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 17.42%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively lower 15.87% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- -16.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- 17.42%
TXRH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
RSG vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -1.24% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.81% | -6.57% | 49.78% | 37.15% | 4.16% | 15.71% | 39.83% | -3.62% | 15.11% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and TXRH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.29 |
The correlation between RSG and TXRH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSG:
$64.32B
TXRH:
$11.08B
RSG:
$6.98
TXRH:
$6.26
RSG:
29.81
TXRH:
26.77
RSG:
2.10
TXRH:
1.67
RSG:
3.87
TXRH:
1.83
RSG:
$16.70B
TXRH:
$6.06B
RSG:
$3.80B
TXRH:
$1.14B
RSG:
$4.89B
TXRH:
$701.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
TXRH
RSG vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSG | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.34 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -0.58 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSG vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and TXRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -76.59% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -19.61% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -24.82% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -30.45% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -58.04% | +24.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -16.13% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -16.15% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.36% | 11.36% | +1.00% |
Volatility
RSG vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is 6.88%, while Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that RSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 9.69% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 22.58% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 29.24% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 30.58% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 35.63% | -16.54% |
Dividends
RSG vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than TXRH's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.71% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 2.02% | 1.34% | 0.46% | 2.13% | 1.68% | 1.59% | 1.58% | 1.90% |
Financials
RSG vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSG vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TXRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
TXRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
TXRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and TXRH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TXRH has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to RSG (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs TXRH's -76.59%.
TXRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and TXRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer