RSG vs. FSLR
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while FSLR operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.46%/yr vs 18.76%/yr for FSLR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSLR's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 17.46%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.76% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- -15.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
FSLR
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 15.41%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 52.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 27.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.76%
RSG vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -0.38% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 2.33% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and FSLR is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.19 |
The correlation between RSG and FSLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSG:
$64.88B
FSLR:
$28.77B
RSG:
$6.98
FSLR:
$15.48
RSG:
30.07
FSLR:
17.27
RSG:
2.12
FSLR:
0.41
RSG:
3.91
FSLR:
5.31
RSG:
5.42
FSLR:
2.91
RSG:
$16.70B
FSLR:
$5.42B
RSG:
$3.80B
FSLR:
$2.26B
RSG:
$4.89B
FSLR:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
FSLR
RSG vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSG | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.70 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 3.57 | -4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSG vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, smaller than the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and FSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -96.22% | +30.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.44% | -35.10% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -59.97% | +37.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -59.97% | +37.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -61.26% | +27.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -16.01% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -63.20% | +51.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.50% | 16.63% | -4.13% |
Volatility
RSG vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is 7.23%, while First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a volatility of 23.37%. This indicates that RSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 23.37% | -16.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 41.98% | -28.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 58.23% | -39.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 54.07% | -35.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 50.84% | -31.76% |
Dividends
RSG vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
RSG vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSG vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FSLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.13M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
FSLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.30M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
FSLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 346.62M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and FSLR have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLR has higher volatility (23.37%) compared to RSG (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs FSLR's -96.22%.
FSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and FSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer