RSF vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
RSF is managed by RiverNorth. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
RSF vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSF vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 4.23% | 4.62% | 9.26% | 9.03% | -1.62% | 27.59% | 3.10% | -12.10% | -1.41% | 5.37% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSF achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than PRCPX's -0.13% return.
RSF
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSF vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSF has a 6.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSF vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
RSF
PRCPX
RSF vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSF | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 3.47 | -2.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 5.52 | -4.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.93 | -0.72 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 4.53 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 21.08 | -16.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSF | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 3.47 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSF and PRCPX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RSF vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
RSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, less than PRCPX's 12.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 11.21% | 11.30% | 10.87% | 10.85% | 11.78% | 9.52% | 11.76% | 6.92% | 8.21% | 9.22% | 1.41% | 0.00% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
RSF vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSF drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSF and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSF | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -23.07% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -3.03% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -14.34% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -1.74% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.16% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 0.65% | +1.14% |
Volatility
RSF vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.10%. This indicates that RSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSF | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 1.10% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 2.52% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.07% | 4.11% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 4.79% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 5.45% | +5.87% |