PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSF vs. JFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSF vs. JFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSF vs. JFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
4.23%4.62%9.26%9.03%-1.62%27.59%3.10%-12.10%-1.41%5.37%
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
-0.82%-0.68%21.92%16.61%-15.15%24.66%-8.05%19.65%-11.69%2.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSF achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than JFR's -0.82% return.


RSF

1D
0.48%
1M
2.27%
YTD
4.23%
6M
4.54%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

JFR

1D
3.87%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-1.94%
1Y
0.69%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSF vs. JFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSF has a 6.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JFR's 0.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSF vs. JFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSF
RSF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JFR
JFR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
JFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
JFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSF vs. JFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSFJFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.05

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.16

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

0.08

+1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

0.26

+4.16

RSF vs. JFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the JFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSF and JFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSFJFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.05

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.44

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.27

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between RSF and JFR is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSF vs. JFR - Dividend Comparison

RSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, less than JFR's 13.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
11.21%11.30%10.87%10.85%11.78%9.52%11.76%6.92%8.21%9.22%1.41%0.00%
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
13.47%13.03%11.43%11.51%9.61%6.66%7.19%7.19%7.95%7.23%6.38%7.03%

Drawdowns

RSF vs. JFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSF drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, smaller than the maximum JFR drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSF and JFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSFJFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.61%

-62.61%

+32.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-11.54%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.02%

-20.40%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-4.15%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-8.84%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

3.53%

-1.74%

Volatility

RSF vs. JFR - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) at 4.96%. This indicates that RSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSFJFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

4.96%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

7.07%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

13.16%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

12.73%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

16.65%

-5.33%