PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSF vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSF vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSF vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
5.09%4.62%9.26%9.03%-1.62%27.59%3.10%-12.10%-1.41%5.37%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
0.85%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSF achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than JGH's 0.85% return.


RSF

1D
0.82%
1M
2.86%
YTD
5.09%
6M
5.39%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*

JGH

1D
1.55%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
0.85%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSF vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSF has a 6.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSF vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSF
RSF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSF Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSF vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSFJGHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.44

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

0.63

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

0.43

+1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.82

1.22

+3.60

RSF vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSF and JGH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSFJGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.44

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.42

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between RSF and JGH is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSF vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

RSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than JGH's 9.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSF
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund
11.11%11.30%10.87%10.85%11.78%9.52%11.76%6.92%8.21%9.22%1.41%0.00%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.98%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%

Drawdowns

RSF vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSF drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, smaller than the maximum JGH drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSF and JGH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSFJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.61%

-43.79%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-11.69%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.02%

-28.66%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-4.36%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-7.09%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

4.09%

-2.29%

Volatility

RSF vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) at 5.07%. This indicates that RSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSFJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

5.07%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

8.26%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.10%

13.86%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

13.67%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

15.85%

-4.53%