PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSEE vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSEE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 25.54% return.


RSEE

1D
-2.89%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
12.65%
6M
11.67%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-1.03%
1M
-12.93%
YTD
25.54%
6M
23.88%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
12.65%20.54%18.54%10.21%-2.49%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
25.54%5.93%8.52%-5.51%14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEE and GSG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2022

0.12

The correlation between RSEE and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSEE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEE
RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSEEGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

1.66

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

6.95

+3.28

RSEE vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSEE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSEEGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-89.62%

+68.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-16.74%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.60%

-16.74%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-62.10%

+58.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-63.69%

+59.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.01%

-0.82%

Volatility

RSEE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 5.46%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSEEGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

5.46%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

20.82%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

23.17%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

22.67%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

22.01%

-2.79%

RSEE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSEE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSEE nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
0.00%0.24%9.02%0.84%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSEE and GSG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSEE has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to GSG (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, RSEE leads with 17.96% vs 14.02% for GSG. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 17.96% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.

RSEE and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

RSEE is categorized as Long-Short, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 0.75% for GSG.

RSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSEE and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer