RSEE vs. FFLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) and FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSEE returned 37.19% vs -0.45% for FFLS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSEE charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

RSEE vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -0.26% return.

RSEE

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 7.65%
• YTD: 15.92%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFLS

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: -0.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEE vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	15.92%	20.54%	18.54%	0.30%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-0.26%	7.49%	17.71%	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEE and FFLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.59

The correlation between RSEE and FFLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSEE vs. FFLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSEE	FFLS
Technology	30.2%	14.4%
Financial Services	13.2%	-4.2%
Industrials	10.9%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	6.9%
Communication Services	8.9%	7.2%
Healthcare	8.0%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	1.6%
Basic Materials	4.1%	-
Energy	3.9%	4.8%
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	2.6%

Return for Risk

RSEE vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEE

RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 62
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 8
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEE vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSEE	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	-0.05	+2.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	-0.01	+2.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.00	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	-0.04	+2.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	-0.09	+12.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSEE vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FFLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and FFLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSEE	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	-0.05	+2.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.80	-0.04

Drawdowns

RSEE vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSEE	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.60%	-11.05%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-11.05%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-4.96%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-3.09%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	5.07%	-1.97%

Volatility

RSEE vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) at 3.54%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSEE	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	3.54%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	6.92%	+6.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	8.94%	+8.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.00%	11.23%	+7.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	11.23%	+7.77%

RSEE vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSEE vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

RSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than FFLS's 6.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.59%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	0.21%	0.24%	9.02%	0.84%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSEE and FFLS in my portfolio?

RSEE and FFLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSEE or FFLS?

RSEE has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to FFLS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs FFLS's -11.05%.

Which ETF is better, RSEE or FFLS?

On 1-year performance, RSEE leads with 37.19% vs -0.45% for FFLS. On fees, RSEE is cheaper at 1.27% per year. On volatility, FFLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSEE or FFLS?

Over the 1-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 37.19% return vs -0.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSEE or FFLS?

RSEE is cheaper with a 1.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSEE or FFLS?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 0.21% for RSEE.

What is the main difference between RSEE and FFLS?

They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and The Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 1.75% for FFLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.