RSEE vs. EMPB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) and EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSEE returned 25.89% vs 17.10% for EMPB. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSEE charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for EMPB.

Performance

RSEE vs. EMPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than EMPB's 14.62% return.

RSEE

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -2.61%
• 6M: 6.73%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.44%

EMPB

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: 14.24%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	$259.83K	$233.39K	$230.26K
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	$298.76K	$233.55K	$305.55K

RSEE vs. EMPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	10.69%	20.54%	-5.36%
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	14.62%	14.84%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEE and EMPB is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.71

The correlation between RSEE and EMPB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSEE vs. EMPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSEE

RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EMPB

EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 66
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSEE vs. EMPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSEE	EMPB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.07	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.81	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	8.07	-1.08

RSEE vs. EMPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the EMPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and EMPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSEE vs. EMPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than EMPB's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and EMPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSEE	EMPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.60%	-7.55%	-14.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-5.98%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	-0.76%	-4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-1.44%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.07%	+1.36%

Volatility

RSEE vs. EMPB - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) at 3.75%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSEE	EMPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	3.75%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	9.07%	+7.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.41%	11.67%	+7.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.20%	11.72%	+7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	11.72%	+7.48%

RSEE vs. EMPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EMPB's 1.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSEE vs. EMPB - Dividend Comparison

RSEE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	0.77%	0.88%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	0.00%	0.24%	9.02%	0.84%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSEE and EMPB in my portfolio?

RSEE and EMPB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSEE or EMPB?

RSEE has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to EMPB (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs EMPB's -7.55%.

Which ETF is better, RSEE or EMPB?

On 1-year performance, RSEE leads with 25.89% vs 17.10% for EMPB. On fees, RSEE is cheaper at 1.27% per year. On volatility, EMPB has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSEE or EMPB?

Over the 1-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 25.89% return vs 17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSEE or EMPB?

RSEE is cheaper with a 1.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSEE or EMPB?

EMPB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for RSEE.

What is the main difference between RSEE and EMPB?

They also come from different issuers: Rareview and NextGen EMP. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 1.82% for EMPB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.