RSDGX vs. USCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund (USCRX).
RSDGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 1, 1996. USCRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 14, 1984.
Performance
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund | -1.95% | 7.07% | 23.42% | 18.63% | -32.44% | 5.90% | 33.25% | 32.26% | -7.83% | 17.09% |
USCRX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund | -0.11% | 16.64% | 8.15% | 12.00% | -13.58% | 11.42% | 8.92% | 16.17% | -7.41% | 14.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSDGX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than USCRX's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RSDGX has outperformed USCRX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while USCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.70% annualized return.
RSDGX
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
USCRX
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSDGX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USCRX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSDGX vs. USCRX — Risk / Return Rank
RSDGX
USCRX
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund (USCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSDGX | USCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.47 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.11 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.08 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 9.19 | -3.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSDGX | USCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.47 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.48 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.68 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSDGX and USCRX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Dividend Comparison
RSDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.80%, more than USCRX's 10.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund | 13.80% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.07% | 28.89% | 17.43% | 13.19% | 46.71% | 14.65% | 3.30% | 9.40% |
USCRX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund | 10.42% | 10.40% | 7.18% | 2.11% | 4.34% | 8.03% | 1.92% | 2.04% | 6.52% | 7.73% | 2.07% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSDGX drawdown since its inception was -74.21%, which is greater than USCRX's maximum drawdown of -49.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSDGX and USCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSDGX | USCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.21% | -49.07% | -25.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -7.63% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.14% | -24.00% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | -24.00% | -26.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.71% | -4.75% | -13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -5.48% | -22.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 1.72% | +1.89% |
Volatility
RSDGX vs. USCRX - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund (USCRX) at 4.39%. This indicates that RSDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSDGX | USCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 4.39% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 6.81% | +8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 10.79% | +13.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 11.51% | +17.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 11.05% | +15.01% |