RSDGX vs. EEOFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSDGX (Victory RS Select Growth Fund) and EEOFX (Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RSDGX returned 4.76%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for EEOFX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSDGX charges 1.40%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for EEOFX.

Performance

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSDGX achieves a 15.95% return, which is significantly lower than EEOFX's 28.61% return.

RSDGX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 5.95%
• YTD: 15.95%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 35.48%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 10.13%

EEOFX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 9.95%
• YTD: 28.61%
• 6M: 29.81%
• 1Y: 57.45%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund	15.95%	7.07%	23.42%	18.63%	-32.44%	5.90%	33.25%	32.26%	-7.83%	7.82%
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	28.61%	23.55%	1.32%	-1.53%	-27.88%	10.83%	62.80%	25.43%	-15.79%	3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RSDGX and EEOFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2017	0.80

The correlation between RSDGX and EEOFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSDGX vs. EEOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSDGX

RSDGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
RSDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RSDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RSDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RSDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
RSDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

EEOFX

EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSDGX	EEOFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.58	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.42	-0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	4.15	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	13.92	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the EEOFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSDGX and EEOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSDGX	EEOFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	2.58	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.15	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.39	+0.01

Drawdowns

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSDGX drawdown since its inception was -74.21%, which is greater than EEOFX's maximum drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSDGX and EEOFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSDGX	EEOFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.21%	-50.17%	-24.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-13.49%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.82%	-31.32%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.14%	-50.17%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-1.00%	-2.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-19.66%	-8.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	4.02%	-1.00%

Volatility

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) is 6.31%, while Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that RSDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSDGX	EEOFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	8.66%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.92%	16.92%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	22.37%	-2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.49%	24.99%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.18%	24.79%	+1.39%

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSDGX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EEOFX's 2.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSDGX vs. EEOFX - Dividend Comparison

RSDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, more than EEOFX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	0.05%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	6.63%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund	11.67%	13.53%	0.00%	0.00%	38.07%	28.89%	17.43%	13.19%	46.71%	14.65%	3.30%	9.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSDGX and EEOFX in my portfolio?

RSDGX and EEOFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSDGX or EEOFX?

EEOFX has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to RSDGX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSDGX dropped -74.21% vs EEOFX's -50.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.