PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBY vs. GNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBY vs. GNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than GNOV's 6.02% return.


RSBY

1D
-0.66%
1M
-2.92%
6M
12.75%
YTD
15.76%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.73%

GNOV

1D
0.34%
1M
0.76%
6M
5.46%
YTD
6.02%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$212.61K$196.69K$422.58K
$290.19K$414.45K$303.00K

RSBY vs. GNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSBY and GNOV is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.21

The correlation between RSBY and GNOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBY vs. GNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOV
GNOV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSBY vs. GNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSBYGNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.08

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

17.02

-13.31

RSBY vs. GNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBY and GNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSBY vs. GNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than GNOV's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and GNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBYGNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-10.70%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-4.56%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.64%

0.00%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-0.69%

-12.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

0.83%

+2.68%

Volatility

RSBY vs. GNOV - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) at 1.32%. This indicates that RSBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBYGNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.32%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

4.78%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

5.88%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

7.51%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.25%

7.51%

+5.74%

RSBY vs. GNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GNOV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBY vs. GNOV - Dividend Comparison

RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while GNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSBY and GNOV have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBY has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to GNOV (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs GNOV's -10.70%.

On 1-year performance, GNOV leads with 14.92% vs 12.59% for RSBY. On fees, GNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GNOV has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for GNOV.

RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while GNOV is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.85% for GNOV.

GNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBY and GNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer