RSBY vs. GNOV
RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) and GNOV (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while GNOV is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBY returned 12.59% vs 14.92% for GNOV. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RSBY charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GNOV.
Performance
RSBY vs. GNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than GNOV's 6.02% return.
RSBY
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.73%
GNOV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 14.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $212.61K | $196.69K | $422.58K | |
| $290.19K | $414.45K | $303.00K |
RSBY vs. GNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 15.76% | -12.98% | -7.79% |
GNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 6.02% | 13.55% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBY and GNOV is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.21 |
The correlation between RSBY and GNOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBY vs. GNOV — Risk / Return Rank
RSBY
GNOV
RSBY vs. GNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSBY | GNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.48 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.08 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 17.02 | -13.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSBY vs. GNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than GNOV's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and GNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBY | GNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -10.70% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -4.56% | -3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | 0.00% | -8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -0.69% | -12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 0.83% | +2.68% |
Volatility
RSBY vs. GNOV - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) at 1.32%. This indicates that RSBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBY | GNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 1.32% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 4.78% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 5.88% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 7.51% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 7.51% | +5.74% |
RSBY vs. GNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GNOV's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBY vs. GNOV - Dividend Comparison
RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while GNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.79% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBY and GNOV have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSBY has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to GNOV (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs GNOV's -10.70%.
On 1-year performance, GNOV leads with 14.92% vs 12.59% for RSBY. On fees, GNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GNOV has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for GNOV.
RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while GNOV is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.85% for GNOV.
GNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBY and GNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer