PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBY vs. DINE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBY vs. DINE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Simplify Tax Aware Diversified Income Strategy ETF (DINE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RSBY

1D
-0.66%
1M
-2.92%
6M
12.75%
YTD
15.76%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.73%

DINE

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.28%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$50.67K$29.27K$11.59K
$290.19K$414.45K$303.00K

RSBY vs. DINE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSBY and DINE is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBY vs. DINE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DINE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSBY vs. DINE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Simplify Tax Aware Diversified Income Strategy ETF (DINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSBYDINEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

RSBY vs. DINE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSBY vs. DINE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than DINE's maximum drawdown of -2.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and DINE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBYDINEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-2.13%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.64%

-1.52%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-0.47%

-12.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

Volatility

RSBY vs. DINE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBYDINEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

4.40%

+6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

4.40%

+8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.25%

4.40%

+8.85%

RSBY vs. DINE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DINE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBY vs. DINE - Dividend Comparison

RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than DINE's 0.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSBY and DINE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DINE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DINE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.20% for DINE.

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.15% for DINE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBY and DINE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer