RSBY vs. BAGY
RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) and BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while BAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBY returned 20.23% vs -37.04% for BAGY. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. RSBY charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BAGY.
Performance
RSBY vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than BAGY's -21.90% return.
RSBY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAGY
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -20.28%
- YTD
- -21.90%
- 6M
- -24.70%
- 1Y
- -37.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 18.23% | -1.73% |
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | -21.90% | -8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBY and BAGY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | -0.14 |
RSBY vs. BAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSBY
BAGY
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
RSBY
BAGY
-
Communication Services
RSBY
BAGY
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSBY
BAGY
-
Consumer Defensive
RSBY
BAGY
-
Healthcare
RSBY
BAGY
-
Industrials
RSBY
BAGY
-
Utilities
RSBY
BAGY
-
Basic Materials
RSBY
BAGY
-
Energy
RSBY
BAGY
-
Financial Services
RSBY
BAGY
Real Estate
RSBY
BAGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBY vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank
RSBY
BAGY
RSBY vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBY | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | -0.89 | +2.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | -1.20 | +3.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.86 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | -0.78 | +3.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | -1.41 | +7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBY | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | -0.89 | +2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | -0.66 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
RSBY vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -47.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and BAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBY | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -47.52% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -47.52% | +39.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -45.06% | +38.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -19.61% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 26.28% | -22.90% |
Volatility
RSBY vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is 1.98%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that RSBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBY | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 9.89% | -7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 33.39% | -24.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 41.93% | -30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 40.86% | -27.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 40.86% | -27.30% |
RSBY vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBY vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison
RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BAGY's 58.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | 58.25% | 30.16% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBY and BAGY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to RSBY (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs BAGY's -47.52%.
On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.23% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.23% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.
RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while BAGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.65% for BAGY.
RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBY and BAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer