PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBY vs. BAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBY vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than BAGY's -21.90% return.


RSBY

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
18.23%
6M
14.22%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAGY

1D
-2.73%
1M
-20.28%
YTD
-21.90%
6M
-24.70%
1Y
-37.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBY vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSBY and BAGY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

-0.14

RSBY vs. BAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSBY
BAGY

Technology

53.7%

-

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

3.1%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
26.5%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

RSBY
53.7%
BAGY

-

Communication Services

RSBY
15.8%
BAGY

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSBY
12.2%
BAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

RSBY
7.7%
BAGY

-

Healthcare

RSBY
4.2%
BAGY

-

Industrials

RSBY
3.1%
BAGY

-

Utilities

RSBY
1.4%
BAGY

-

Basic Materials

RSBY
1.1%
BAGY

-

Energy

RSBY
0.6%
BAGY

-

Financial Services

RSBY
0.2%
BAGY
26.5%

Real Estate

RSBY
0.1%
BAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBY vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BAGY
BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBY vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBYBAGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

-0.89

+2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

-1.20

+3.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.86

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.78

+3.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.70

-1.41

+7.11

RSBY vs. BAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BAGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBY and BAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBYBAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

-0.89

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

-0.66

+0.43

Drawdowns

RSBY vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -47.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and BAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBYBAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-47.52%

+24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-47.52%

+39.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

-45.06%

+38.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.81%

-19.61%

+5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

26.28%

-22.90%

Volatility

RSBY vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is 1.98%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that RSBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBYBAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

9.89%

-7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

33.39%

-24.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

41.93%

-30.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

40.86%

-27.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

40.86%

-27.30%

RSBY vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBY vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison

RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BAGY's 58.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
58.25%30.16%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.75%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSBY and BAGY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to RSBY (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs BAGY's -47.52%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.23% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.23% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.

RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while BAGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.65% for BAGY.

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBY and BAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer