RSBT vs. PQTIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and PQTIX (PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class) are both funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while PQTIX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSBT returned 4.98%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for PQTIX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for PQTIX.

Performance

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than PQTIX's 6.45% return.

RSBT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQTIX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: 4.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	10.49%	10.31%	-2.90%	-11.91%
PQTIX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class	6.45%	2.39%	-2.88%	-4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and PQTIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023	0.48

The correlation between RSBT and PQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. PQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PQTIX

PQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
PQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBT	PQTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.45	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.22	-0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.45	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	4.51	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	12.80	-0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the PQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and PQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBT	PQTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.45	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.48	-0.39

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum PQTIX drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and PQTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	PQTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-27.65%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-4.63%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	-18.59%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-10.89%	+10.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-9.27%	-3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.62%	+0.74%

Volatility

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) at 1.84%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	PQTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	1.84%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	6.62%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	8.51%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	9.90%	+3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.68%	9.41%	+4.27%

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTIX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBT vs. PQTIX - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while PQTIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PQTIX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.83%	2.47%	5.65%	2.55%	0.39%	0.25%	0.00%	8.06%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	2.90%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBT and PQTIX in my portfolio?

RSBT and PQTIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSBT or PQTIX?

RSBT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to PQTIX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs PQTIX's -27.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.