RSBT vs. IBIT
RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. RSBT is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, RSBT returned 23.51% vs -39.67% for IBIT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
RSBT vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -21.94%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -39.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 6.42% | 10.31% | 0.03% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and IBIT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
IBIT
RSBT vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSBT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.85 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | -0.78 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | -1.37 | +10.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -52.11% | +28.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -52.11% | +45.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -49.45% | +45.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -16.53% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 29.64% | -27.19% |
Volatility
RSBT vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 5.71%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 12.07% | -6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 34.45% | -23.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 44.10% | -29.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 50.26% | -36.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 50.26% | -36.38% |
RSBT vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBT vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 3.01% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBT and IBIT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to RSBT (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 23.51% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 23.51% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.25% for IBIT.
RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBT and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer