RSBT vs. ETHA
RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while ETHA is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. RSBT is actively managed, while ETHA is passively managed. Over the past year, RSBT returned 23.51% vs -34.33% for ETHA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ETHA.
Performance
RSBT vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA's -43.96% return.
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -27.59%
- YTD
- -43.96%
- 6M
- -45.98%
- 1Y
- -34.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 6.42% | 10.31% | -7.51% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -43.96% | -11.31% | -4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and ETHA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
ETHA
RSBT vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSBT | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.94 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | -0.57 | +4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | -0.98 | +10.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and ETHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -67.56% | +43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -67.56% | +61.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -65.65% | +61.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -33.25% | +20.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 39.22% | -36.77% |
Volatility
RSBT vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 5.71%, while iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 17.30% | -11.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 46.58% | -35.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 69.29% | -54.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 72.65% | -58.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 72.65% | -58.77% |
RSBT vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBT vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 3.01% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBT and ETHA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to RSBT (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs ETHA's -67.56%.
On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 23.51% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 23.51% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.
RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while ETHA is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.25% for ETHA.
RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBT and ETHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer