RSBT vs. DUKZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBT returned 28.83% vs 8.98% for DUKZ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.

Performance

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than DUKZ's 3.09% return.

RSBT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DUKZ

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 8.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	10.49%	10.31%	-10.48%
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	3.09%	4.24%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and DUKZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024	0.52

The correlation between RSBT and DUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSBT	DUKZ
Financial Services	184.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	4.6%
Industrials	-	2.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	7.9%
Utilities	-	85.2%

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DUKZ

DUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
DUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
DUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
DUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBT	DUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.11	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.02	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	2.65	+1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	9.83	+2.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and DUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBT	DUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.11	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	1.26	-1.16

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than DUKZ's maximum drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and DUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	DUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-4.70%	-18.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-3.39%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-1.14%	-11.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	0.91%	+1.45%

Volatility

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) at 1.83%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	DUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	1.83%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	3.60%	+6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	4.27%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	4.28%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.68%	4.28%	+9.40%

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBT vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than DUKZ's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	3.77%	4.05%	2.44%	0.00%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	2.90%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBT and DUKZ in my portfolio?

RSBT and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSBT or DUKZ?

RSBT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DUKZ (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs DUKZ's -4.70%.

Which ETF is better, RSBT or DUKZ?

On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 28.83% vs 8.98% for DUKZ. On fees, RSBT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, DUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSBT or DUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 28.83% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSBT or DUKZ?

RSBT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSBT or DUKZ?

DUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.90% for RSBT.

What is the main difference between RSBT and DUKZ?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.