RSBT vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. RSBT is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSBT returned 4.98%/yr vs 129.64%/yr for BWET. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

RSBT vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

RSBT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	10.49%	10.31%	-2.90%	-4.28%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	96.22%	-39.21%	15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and BWET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.01

The correlation between RSBT and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSBT vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSBT	BWET
Financial Services	184.1%	8.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBT	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	18.57	-16.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	6.55	-3.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.96	-0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	59.51	-54.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	158.07	-145.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSBT vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBT	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	18.57	-16.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	1.90	-1.80

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-56.90%	+33.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-30.64%	+24.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	-56.90%	+37.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-11.29%	+11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-24.09%	+11.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	11.51%	-9.15%

Volatility

RSBT vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 3.10%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	33.96%	-30.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	88.49%	-78.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	98.35%	-84.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	70.45%	-56.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.68%	70.45%	-56.77%

RSBT vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBT vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	2.90%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBT and BWET in my portfolio?

RSBT and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSBT or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to RSBT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, RSBT or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 4.98% for RSBT. On fees, RSBT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSBT or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSBT or BWET?

RSBT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSBT or BWET?

RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between RSBT and BWET?

RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.