RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L
RS2G.L (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - RS2G.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RS2G.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RS2G.L
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 18.06% | 4.55% | 11.87% | 12.47% | -11.37% | 15.31% | 15.83% | 21.59% | -7.91% | 5.88% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.27% | 17.50% | -9.18% | 24.39% | 11.85% | 23.29% | -4.10% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RS2G.L and MWRD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between RS2G.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Technology
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Healthcare
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Financial Services
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Real Estate
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Energy
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Basic Materials
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Utilities
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Communication Services
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
RS2G.L
MWRD.L
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RS2G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RS2G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | — | — |
Drawdowns
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS2G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RS2G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.93% | — | — |
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RS2G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RS2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RS2G.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RS2G.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2G.L.
RS2G.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. RS2G.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RS2G.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for RS2G.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer