PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRRRX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund (RRRRX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRRRX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RRRRX has underperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 5.66%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.52% annualized return.


RRRRX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
10.74%
6M
9.59%
1Y
9.08%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
5.66%

PRRSX

1D
-1.99%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
11.65%
6M
9.82%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
6.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRRRX
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund
10.74%-0.72%6.11%12.35%-27.32%43.02%-4.84%29.66%-3.21%6.43%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
11.65%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RRRRX and PRRSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.94

The correlation between RRRRX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRRRX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRRRX
RRRRX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RRRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RRRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund (RRRRX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRRRXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

1.06

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

1.49

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.83

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.98

6.33

-2.35

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRRRX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRRRXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.06

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.17

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.30

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRRRX drawdown since its inception was -74.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRRRX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRRRXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.05%

-77.82%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-9.05%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.46%

-17.77%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-37.14%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

-45.75%

+4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.75%

-3.65%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-13.09%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.61%

+0.02%

Volatility

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund (RRRRX) is 3.78%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that RRRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRRRXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.28%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

10.18%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

14.28%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

20.21%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

21.87%

-1.23%

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRRRX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRRRX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

RRRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%
RRRRX
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund
2.29%2.02%2.77%1.82%4.44%7.68%3.53%7.94%4.56%4.97%12.39%13.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, RRRRX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to RRRRX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRRRX dropped -74.05% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRRRX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer