PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. SWRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWRSX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RRPAX has outperformed SWRSX with an annualized return of 2.98%, while SWRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.66% annualized return.


RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.98%

SWRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.97%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
1.72%6.84%1.95%3.80%-12.01%5.83%10.88%8.38%-1.32%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and SWRSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.78

The correlation between RRPAX and SWRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. SWRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRSX
SWRSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SWRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRPAXSWRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

2.73

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.03

8.25

+11.78

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the SWRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and SWRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRPAXSWRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.61

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.20

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.50

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, which is greater than SWRSX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and SWRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXSWRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-14.29%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-1.90%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-4.46%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-14.29%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-14.29%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.10%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-3.72%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.63%

-0.40%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) is 0.58%, while Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that RRPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXSWRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.86%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.32%

2.20%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

3.26%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

6.04%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

5.37%

-2.67%

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRSX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. SWRSX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than SWRSX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.92%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%0.00%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
3.78%4.20%3.68%3.11%7.95%4.45%1.33%2.20%2.87%1.75%1.81%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and SWRSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWRSX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to RRPAX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs SWRSX's -14.29%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and SWRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer