PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. IPBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than IPBAX's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RRPAX has underperformed IPBAX with an annualized return of 2.98%, while IPBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.11% annualized return.


RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.98%

IPBAX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.61%
YTD
15.33%
6M
15.65%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.97%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
15.33%10.37%8.12%5.35%-10.75%7.74%8.03%9.87%-4.02%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and IPBAX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RRPAX and IPBAX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. IPBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IPBAX
IPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRPAXIPBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.58

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

6.16

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.03

24.09

-4.07

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the IPBAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and IPBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRPAXIPBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

3.09

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.88

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.86

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.71

-0.20

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, which is greater than IPBAX's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and IPBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXIPBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-15.13%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-3.84%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-5.58%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-13.94%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-13.94%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-3.13%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.98%

-0.75%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) is 0.58%, while Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that RRPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXIPBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

2.35%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.32%

6.00%

-4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

7.68%

-5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

7.20%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

5.98%

-3.28%

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IPBAX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. IPBAX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than IPBAX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
2.26%2.58%2.26%3.71%5.07%3.84%1.26%2.12%2.57%1.96%1.77%2.13%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.92%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and IPBAX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPBAX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to RRPAX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs IPBAX's -15.13%.

IPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and IPBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer