PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. EARRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RRPAX has underperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 2.98%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.66% annualized return.


RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.98%

EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
3.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.97%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.58%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and EARRX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.72

The correlation between RRPAX and EARRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRPAXEARRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.57

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

4.84

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.03

18.23

+1.79

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRPAXEARRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.32

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.07

-0.56

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and EARRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXEARRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-10.27%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-0.79%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-1.18%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-6.39%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-10.27%

+3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.10%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-1.08%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.21%

+0.02%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.49%. This indicates that RRPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXEARRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.49%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.32%

1.14%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.50%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

2.77%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

2.71%

-0.01%

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than EARRX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
3.82%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.92%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RRPAX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and EARRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer