PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRGIX vs. SCDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRGIX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than SCDGX's 11.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RRGIX has underperformed SCDGX with an annualized return of 4.93%, while SCDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.


RRGIX

1D
1.01%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
8.24%
6M
8.39%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
4.93%

SCDGX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.21%
YTD
11.76%
6M
11.67%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
15.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRGIX
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund
8.24%8.77%2.97%11.22%-26.42%30.53%-4.24%25.09%-4.15%11.62%
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
11.76%16.32%20.01%25.55%-15.61%25.54%16.14%35.68%-6.06%21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RRGIX and SCDGX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RRGIX and SCDGX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRGIX vs. SCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRGIX
RRGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RRGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RRGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDGX
SCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRGIXSCDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

3.24

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

14.12

-9.54

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SCDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRGIX and SCDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRGIXSCDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.54

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.76

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.82

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.54

-0.47

Drawdowns

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.86%, which is greater than SCDGX's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRGIX and SCDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRGIXSCDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.86%

-55.85%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-9.43%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-20.72%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

-22.77%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.87%

-35.07%

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-0.32%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-8.57%

-17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.15%

+0.51%

Volatility

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) at 3.25%. This indicates that RRGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRGIXSCDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.25%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

9.17%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

12.04%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

17.08%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

18.39%

-1.30%

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRGIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRGIX vs. SCDGX - Dividend Comparison

RRGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than SCDGX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RRGIX
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.45%2.65%3.08%1.39%7.02%8.80%9.11%16.41%5.70%3.74%4.24%4.31%
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
9.52%10.50%9.11%5.12%9.28%14.09%6.70%8.88%14.12%6.15%6.92%8.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRGIX and SCDGX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RRGIX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to SCDGX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRGIX dropped -73.86% vs SCDGX's -55.85%.

SCDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRGIX and SCDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer