RRGIX vs. FIKMX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

RRGIX (DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund) and FIKMX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, RRGIX returned 1.86%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for FIKMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RRGIX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKMX.

Performance

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRGIX achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 4.43% return.

RRGIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 9.17%
• YTD: 10.94%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 4.75%

FIKMX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.08%
• 6M: 4.26%
• YTD: 4.43%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: 8.39%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RRGIX DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund	10.94%	8.77%	2.97%	11.22%	-26.42%	30.53%	-4.24%	25.09%	-1.86%
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z	4.43%	7.29%	8.03%	9.51%	-14.48%	19.04%	-0.98%	18.04%	-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RRGIX and FIKMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.88

The correlation between RRGIX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RRGIX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRGIX

RRGIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
RRGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RRGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RRGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RRGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RRGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FIKMX

FIKMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FIKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FIKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FIKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FIKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RRGIX	FIKMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.90	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.70	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	2.33	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	10.10	-4.29

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FIKMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRGIX and FIKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.86%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRGIX and FIKMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRGIX	FIKMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.86%	-34.49%	-39.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-3.43%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-7.16%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.35%	-18.04%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-0.40%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.31%	-5.08%	-21.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	0.79%	+1.88%

Volatility

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.46%. This indicates that RRGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRGIX	FIKMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	1.46%	+2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	3.37%	+6.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	4.21%	+7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	6.49%	+9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	10.53%	+6.53%

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRGIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RRGIX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison

RRGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FIKMX's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z	3.43%	4.80%	4.81%	5.15%	6.24%	1.59%	4.90%	5.82%	2.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RRGIX DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund	2.83%	2.65%	3.08%	1.39%	7.02%	8.80%	9.11%	16.41%	5.70%	3.74%	4.24%	4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRGIX and FIKMX in my portfolio?

RRGIX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRGIX or FIKMX?

RRGIX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to FIKMX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRGIX dropped -73.86% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.