PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRFIX vs. FIHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Inflation Protected Securities Fund (RRFIX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRFIX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RRFIX has underperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 2.70%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.


RRFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.70%

FIHBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.24%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRFIX
Federated Hermes Inflation Protected Securities Fund
1.55%5.68%1.72%2.72%-11.73%5.63%10.77%8.35%-0.95%2.37%
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
1.27%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RRFIX and FIHBX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.20

The correlation between RRFIX and FIHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRFIX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRFIX
RRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Inflation Protected Securities Fund (RRFIX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRFIXFIHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.71

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.88

14.30

-9.42

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRFIX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRFIXFIHBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.96

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.68

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.88

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.36

-0.78

Drawdowns

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRFIX drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum FIHBX drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRFIX and FIHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRFIXFIHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-31.05%

+16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-2.45%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.67%

-3.60%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.68%

-16.35%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.68%

-21.67%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-2.30%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.46%

+0.55%

Volatility

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Inflation Protected Securities Fund (RRFIX) is 0.87%, while Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that RRFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRFIXFIHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

1.08%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

2.74%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

3.39%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

5.19%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.55%

5.76%

-0.21%

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRFIX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRFIX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

RRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than FIHBX's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.44%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
RRFIX
Federated Hermes Inflation Protected Securities Fund
3.88%3.72%3.82%3.73%6.57%3.51%0.93%1.94%2.42%2.15%1.64%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRFIX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIHBX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to RRFIX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRFIX dropped -14.70% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRFIX and FIHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer