PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RQP.TO (RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) and RIDH.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RQP.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by RBC, while RIDH.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RQP.TO returned 1.75%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for RIDH.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQP.TO achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than RIDH.TO's 15.46% return.

RQP.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.19%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
—

RIDH.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.56%
6M
11.06%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RQP.TO
RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		1.35%4.15%6.22%6.87%-8.19%-2.20%1.15%
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		15.46%32.49%12.69%17.54%-3.96%19.17%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RQP.TO and RIDH.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.10

The correlation between RQP.TO and RIDH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF

Often compared with RIDH.TO:
RIDH.TO vs. TILV.TORIDH.TO vs. RPF.TORIDH.TO vs. QDX.TORIDH.TO vs. RCDC.TORIDH.TO vs. FCRI.TORIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEORIDH.TO vs. RUD.TO

Return for Risk

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RQP.TO
RQP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RQP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO
RIDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RQP.TORIDH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.96
2.98

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.49
4.06

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.56

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

4.14

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.52

18.50

+9.03

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQP.TO and RIDH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQP.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum RIDH.TO drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQP.TO and RIDH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RQP.TORIDH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-34.53%

+20.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.65%

-8.67%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-14.33%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.93%

-15.01%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.53%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-4.40%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

1.93%

-1.81%

Volatility

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO) is 0.33%, while RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that RQP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIDH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RQP.TORIDH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

3.14%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.85%

9.92%

-9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16%

12.02%

-10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.86%

13.76%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

15.76%

-11.99%

Dividends

RQP.TO vs. RIDH.TO - Dividend Comparison

RQP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than RIDH.TO's 3.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		3.02%3.10%3.69%3.70%4.41%2.63%3.63%4.07%4.55%2.91%3.33%3.28%
RQP.TO
RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		3.70%3.58%3.25%3.18%2.67%2.29%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RQP.TO and RIDH.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQP.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RIDH.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQP.TO and RIDH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer