RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO
RQO.TO (RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF) and HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RQO.TO returned 1.58%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for HAB.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQO.TO achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than HAB.TO's 0.81% return.
RQO.TO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
HAB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQO.TO RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.17% | 3.57% | 5.40% | 6.86% | -7.50% | -2.27% | 0.63% |
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.13% | 7.98% | 7.30% | -9.51% | -1.26% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQO.TO and HAB.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RQO.TO and HAB.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RQO.TO
HAB.TO
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQO.TO) and Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RQO.TO | HAB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.97 | 1.17 | +0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.94 | 1.82 | +24.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 86.01 | 4.76 | +81.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQO.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, smaller than the maximum HAB.TO drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQO.TO and HAB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQO.TO | HAB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -23.78% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.11% | -2.46% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.93% | -3.28% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.65% | -14.20% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.32% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -2.58% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.94% | -0.91% |
Volatility
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQO.TO) is 0.16%, while Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that RQO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQO.TO | HAB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 1.32% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.48% | 3.27% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71% | 4.51% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 6.49% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 7.84% | -4.91% |
Dividends
RQO.TO vs. HAB.TO - Dividend Comparison
RQO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than HAB.TO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 3.95% | 3.96% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.39% | 3.35% |
RQO.TO RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.03% | 2.66% | 2.56% | 1.98% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQO.TO and HAB.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and Global X.
Find the right allocation for RQO.TO and HAB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer