HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO
HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) and DXO.TO (Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAB.TO returned 1.98%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for DXO.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than DXO.TO's 1.86% return.
HAB.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
DXO.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.13% | 7.98% | 7.30% | -9.51% | -1.26% | 8.46% | 7.77% | 0.46% | 3.53% |
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 1.86% | 6.82% | 6.51% | 11.28% | -12.16% | 5.03% | 10.15% | 12.26% | -1.94% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAB.TO and DXO.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2017 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, HAB.TO and DXO.TO have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAB.TO
DXO.TO
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAB.TO | DXO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.37 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 10.24 | -5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than DXO.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAB.TO and DXO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAB.TO | DXO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -17.61% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -2.41% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.28% | -3.78% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.20% | -15.91% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.51% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -2.94% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.56% | +0.38% |
Volatility
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO) at 0.97%. This indicates that HAB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAB.TO | DXO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.97% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 2.65% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 3.34% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 5.63% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 7.74% | +0.10% |
Dividends
HAB.TO vs. DXO.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than DXO.TO's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.55% | 5.61% | 5.65% | 5.29% | 4.15% | 4.20% | 3.96% | 4.31% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 3.95% | 3.96% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.39% | 3.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAB.TO and DXO.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for HAB.TO and DXO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer