HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO
HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAB.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while HBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. HAB.TO is actively managed, while HBNK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAB.TO returned 6.05%/yr vs 37.95%/yr for HBNK.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 36.76% return.
HAB.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
HBNK.TO
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 35.31%
- YTD
- 36.76%
- 1Y
- 75.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.13% | 7.98% | 6.33% |
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 36.76% | 43.71% | 24.77% | 9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAB.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAB.TO
HBNK.TO
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAB.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 2.00 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 8.91 | -7.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 38.63 | -33.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAB.TO and HBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAB.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -14.78% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -8.48% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.28% | -14.78% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | 0.00% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -2.24% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.95% | -1.01% |
Volatility
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) is 1.34%, while Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that HAB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAB.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 4.00% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 11.63% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 13.39% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 12.77% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 12.77% | -4.93% |
Dividends
HAB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than HBNK.TO's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 3.95% | 3.96% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.39% | 3.35% |
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.47% | 3.24% | 4.15% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAB.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAB.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HBNK.TO is Financials Equities.
Find the right allocation for HAB.TO and HBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer