RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for XCS6.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has outperformed XCS6.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while XCS6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -21.96% | 7.77% | 24.32% | 37.46% | -24.88% | 16.25% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 26.93% | -16.14% | 35.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2014 | 0.72 |
The correlation between RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
XCS6.DE
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.04 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 0.13 | +5.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 0.27 | +15.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.12 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.17 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.17 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.16 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, smaller than the maximum XCS6.DE drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -56.31% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.82% | -17.28% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.48% | -24.77% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | -49.94% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -56.31% | +11.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -33.60% | +21.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -21.19% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 8.27% | -6.06% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) is 5.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that RQFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 7.17% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 13.14% | -2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.53% | -3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 27.67% | -6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 25.33% | -3.51% |
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while XCS6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and XCS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer