PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than MCHN.DE's -0.35% return.


RQFI.DE

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.50%
YTD
10.42%
6M
12.27%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
5.34%

MCHN.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RQFI.DE
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D
10.42%11.14%22.25%-16.68%-21.96%5.93%
MCHN.DE
Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc
-0.35%13.01%25.16%-15.29%-18.40%-11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.83

The correlation between RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQFI.DE
RQFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHN.DE
MCHN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RQFI.DEMCHN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

1.13

+4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

2.63

+12.93

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RQFI.DEMCHN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

0.75

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.12

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.11

+0.42

Drawdowns

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than MCHN.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQFI.DEMCHN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.79%

-45.79%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-11.21%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.48%

-23.24%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.44%

-45.54%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-16.30%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-24.07%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.81%

-2.60%

Volatility

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) is 5.89%, while Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that RQFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQFI.DEMCHN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

6.52%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

11.75%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

16.86%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

25.04%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.82%

24.77%

-2.95%

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RQFI.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Dividend Comparison

RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while MCHN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCHN.DE
Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RQFI.DE
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D
1.44%1.84%1.40%1.98%1.97%0.90%1.32%0.75%2.31%2.00%1.81%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MCHN.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MCHN.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.

RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while MCHN.DE tracks MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RQFI.DE and 0.35% for MCHN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and MCHN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer