RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and DXS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Pacific ex Japan Screened UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - RQFI.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while DXS6.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan Select Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE returned 4.72%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for DXS6.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RQFI.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXS6.DE.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than DXS6.DE's 8.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has underperformed DXS6.DE with an annualized return of 4.72%, while DXS6.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
DXS6.DE
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.36% | 11.14% | 22.23% | -16.63% | -21.95% | 7.70% | 24.38% | 37.47% | -24.90% | 16.28% |
DXS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI Pacific ex Japan Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.66% | 6.37% | 13.01% | 1.46% | -1.97% | 12.85% | -3.11% | 21.25% | -6.24% | 10.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and DXS6.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RQFI.DE and DXS6.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
DXS6.DE
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Pacific ex Japan Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) (DXS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RQFI.DE | DXS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 1.44 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 3.64 | +8.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than DXS6.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and DXS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | DXS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -36.97% | -14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -9.20% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -19.92% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.42% | -19.92% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -36.97% | -8.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.83% | -2.12% | -9.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -7.77% | -20.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.66% | -1.13% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Pacific ex Japan Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) (DXS6.DE) at 4.68%. This indicates that RQFI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | DXS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 4.68% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 12.12% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 15.28% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 15.48% | +5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 16.75% | +5.13% |
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DXS6.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. DXS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while DXS6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI Pacific ex Japan Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQFI.DE and DXS6.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXS6.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXS6.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
RQFI.DE is categorized as China Equities, while DXS6.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while DXS6.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Select Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RQFI.DE and 0.25% for DXS6.DE.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and DXS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer