RPV vs. OAKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX).
RPV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. OAKMX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Aug 5, 1991.
Performance
RPV vs. OAKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPV vs. OAKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 4.29% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | -8.69% | 24.80% | -12.31% | 17.30% |
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | -2.47% | 14.13% | 16.02% | 30.92% | -13.38% | 34.85% | 12.90% | 27.14% | -12.76% | 21.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than OAKMX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed OAKMX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while OAKMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.
RPV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
OAKMX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPV vs. OAKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. OAKMX — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
OAKMX
RPV vs. OAKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPV | OAKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.54 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 0.87 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.82 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 3.26 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPV | OAKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.54 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.66 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.71 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and OAKMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPV vs. OAKMX - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than OAKMX's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.42% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | 0.94% | 0.92% | 1.12% | 1.02% | 0.92% | 1.94% | 0.17% | 8.33% | 8.13% | 4.06% | 2.58% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
RPV vs. OAKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than OAKMX's maximum drawdown of -56.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and OAKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | OAKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -56.19% | -19.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -13.46% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -23.68% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | -41.43% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -4.97% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -6.41% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.39% | -0.39% |
Volatility
RPV vs. OAKMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 3.71%, while Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | OAKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.20% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 10.34% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 18.77% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 18.35% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 20.43% | +1.54% |