RPV vs. NVDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while NVDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. RPV is passively managed, while NVDY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RPV returned 18.14%/yr vs 54.54%/yr for NVDY. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.

Performance

RPV vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 13.06% return.

RPV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: 10.64%

NVDY

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 17.67%
• 1Y: 46.64%
• 3Y*: 54.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPV vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	10.48%	17.70%	12.41%	16.41%
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	13.06%	27.38%	114.23%	42.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and NVDY is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.11

The correlation between RPV and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RPV vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 66
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

NVDY

NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 52
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPV	NVDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.72	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.29	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.29	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	3.66	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.45	9.00	+3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPV vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPV	NVDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.72	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.64	-1.26

Drawdowns

RPV vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and NVDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPV	NVDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.32%	-34.08%	-41.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.74%	-12.81%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.50%	-34.08%	+18.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-6.66%	+6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-6.15%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	5.20%	-2.99%

Volatility

RPV vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.54%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPV	NVDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	9.46%	-6.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	20.68%	-12.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	27.35%	-14.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	38.24%	-20.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	38.24%	-16.32%

RPV vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPV vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than NVDY's 61.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	61.36%	83.10%	83.65%	22.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.28%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPV and NVDY in my portfolio?

RPV and NVDY have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPV or NVDY?

NVDY has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to RPV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, RPV or NVDY?

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 54.54% vs 18.14% for RPV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPV or NVDY?

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 54.54% return vs 18.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPV or NVDY?

RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPV or NVDY?

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 61.36%, compared with 2.28% for RPV.

What is the main difference between RPV and NVDY?

RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NVDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.99% for NVDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.