PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPV vs. DIVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RPV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RPV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
4.57%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%28.09%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.04%16.72%18.44%-0.51%3.51%19.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.04% return.


RPV

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
4.57%
6M
9.34%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
10.37%

DIVZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
3.04%
6M
3.75%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RPV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPVDIVZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.06

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

1.47

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.58

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

6.66

+0.25

RPV vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and DIVZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPVDIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.06

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.79

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.92

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and DIVZ is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RPV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than DIVZ's 2.68% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.41%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.68%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RPV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and DIVZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RPVDIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-15.42%

-59.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-8.47%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-15.42%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-4.56%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-3.47%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.06%

+0.92%

Volatility

RPV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) at 2.80%. This indicates that RPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RPVDIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

2.80%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

6.57%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

12.04%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

12.58%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

12.61%

+9.36%