RPV vs. AVUV
RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. RPV is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPV returned 9.29%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
RPV vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
RPV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
RPV vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 10.48% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | -8.69% | 7.41% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and AVUV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RPV and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RPV vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPV
AVUV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPV
AVUV
Healthcare
RPV
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
RPV
AVUV
Energy
RPV
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
RPV
AVUV
Basic Materials
RPV
AVUV
Industrials
RPV
AVUV
Communication Services
RPV
AVUV
Utilities
RPV
AVUV
Technology
RPV
AVUV
Real Estate
RPV
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
AVUV
RPV vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPV | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 2.10 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.02 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 4.61 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 13.69 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPV | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.10 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
RPV vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -49.42% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -7.95% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -28.79% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -28.79% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -1.12% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -7.95% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.67% | -0.46% |
Volatility
RPV vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.54%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 4.08% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 11.34% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 17.54% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 22.74% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 28.30% | -6.38% |
RPV vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPV vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPV and AVUV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUV has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to RPV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 9.29% for RPV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.
RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.
RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.25% for AVUV.
RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPV and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer