PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPMGX vs. TRMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than TRMSX's 10.19% return.


RPMGX

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.63%
6M
2.42%
YTD
2.74%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
10.66%
ALL TIME*
12.70%

TRMSX

1D
1.54%
1M
-2.84%
6M
9.40%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RPMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund
2.74%3.65%21.08%20.27%-22.51%12.43%
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
10.19%12.61%19.98%29.90%-28.56%7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RPMGX and TRMSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.89

The correlation between RPMGX and TRMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPMGX vs. TRMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPMGX
RPMGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RPMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RPMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMSX
TRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPMGXTRMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.67

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

5.53

-4.23

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the TRMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPMGX and TRMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, which is greater than TRMSX's maximum drawdown of -37.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and TRMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPMGXTRMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-37.34%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-9.51%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-26.02%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-37.34%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-3.91%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-13.52%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.76%

+0.28%

Volatility

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) is 2.51%, while T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that RPMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPMGXTRMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

4.08%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

13.21%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

17.67%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

23.12%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

22.78%

-3.84%

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPMGX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than TRMSX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPMGX vs. TRMSX - Dividend Comparison

RPMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than TRMSX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund
6.18%6.35%20.43%6.35%2.60%10.52%4.53%5.29%12.12%8.04%3.45%9.51%
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.89%6.49%1.98%0.86%1.92%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPMGX and TRMSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMSX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to RPMGX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPMGX dropped -54.66% vs TRMSX's -37.34%.

TRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPMGX and TRMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer