PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIFX vs. LFRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIFX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than LFRIX's 2.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPIFX having a 4.66% annualized return and LFRIX not far behind at 4.47%.


RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
4.66%
ALL TIME*
4.64%

LFRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.25%
6M
2.13%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
4.47%
ALL TIME*
4.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
0.83%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
2.32%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIFX and LFRIX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2008

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between RPIFX and LFRIX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIFX vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIFXLFRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.78

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.40

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

12.60

-4.47

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the LFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIFX and LFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIFX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum LFRIX drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIFX and LFRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIFXLFRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-27.90%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.55%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.28%

-2.59%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

-6.23%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

-21.75%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.37%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-1.93%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.42%

+0.02%

Volatility

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) is 0.31%, while Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) has a volatility of 0.34%. This indicates that RPIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIFXLFRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.34%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

1.90%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

2.44%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

2.87%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

3.91%

-0.12%

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIFX vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison

RPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than LFRIX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.24%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
5.80%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIFX and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.34%) compared to RPIFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIFX dropped -25.10% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIFX and LFRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer