RPIFX vs. DAFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX).
RPIFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008. DAFRX is managed by Dunham Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013.
Performance
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | -0.94% | 6.71% | 8.47% | 10.13% | -1.96% | 4.67% | 2.42% | 8.82% | 0.39% | 3.78% |
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | -1.23% | 5.04% | 7.26% | 13.05% | -2.54% | 3.51% | -0.09% | 7.18% | -1.06% | 2.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPIFX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than DAFRX's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIFX has outperformed DAFRX with an annualized return of 4.79%, while DAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.81% annualized return.
RPIFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
DAFRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPIFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than DAFRX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPIFX vs. DAFRX — Risk / Return Rank
RPIFX
DAFRX
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPIFX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.45 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 1.96 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.36 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.45 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 5.85 | +4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPIFX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.45 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 2.07 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 1.03 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPIFX and DAFRX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Dividend Comparison
RPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than DAFRX's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | 6.63% | 7.22% | 7.77% | 6.53% | 4.12% | 3.94% | 4.29% | 5.12% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 4.45% |
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | 6.94% | 7.26% | 7.87% | 8.91% | 5.76% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 4.36% | 4.30% | 3.31% | 3.01% | 3.13% |
Drawdowns
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPIFX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than DAFRX's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIFX and DAFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPIFX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -19.42% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -2.23% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.90% | -7.08% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.67% | -19.42% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.81% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -0.98% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.58% | -0.06% |
Volatility
RPIFX vs. DAFRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) is 0.71%, while Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that RPIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPIFX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.95% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.76% | 1.51% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 2.46% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 2.25% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 3.38% | +0.41% |