PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIEX vs. NTIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) and Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIEX achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than NTIIX's -0.55% return.


RPIEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.92%
6M
2.43%
YTD
3.33%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
2.68%
ALL TIME*
2.87%

NTIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.55%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
3.33%4.15%9.82%-1.82%3.08%-0.52%
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.55%2.16%-0.85%9.79%-6.51%-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIEX and NTIIX is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIEX vs. NTIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPIEX
RPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NTIIX
NTIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NTIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NTIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) and Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIEXNTIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

1.61

+0.87

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the NTIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIEX and NTIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIEX drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum NTIIX drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIEX and NTIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIEXNTIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-12.35%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-3.35%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-8.52%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-3.16%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-5.10%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.58%

-0.37%

Volatility

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) at 0.16%. This indicates that RPIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIEXNTIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.16%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

2.21%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

3.50%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

4.91%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.21%

4.91%

-0.70%

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIEX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than NTIIX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIEX vs. NTIIX - Dividend Comparison

RPIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than NTIIX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.83%4.07%4.24%3.85%1.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
5.67%7.07%9.06%7.53%15.28%3.76%1.93%2.51%4.36%0.61%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIEX and NTIIX have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPIEX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to NTIIX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIEX dropped -7.84% vs NTIIX's -12.35%.

NTIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIEX and NTIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer