PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTIIX vs. GMODX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) and GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTIIX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than GMODX's 1.42% return.


NTIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.55%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.21%

GMODX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.16%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
4.17%
ALL TIME*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.55%2.16%-0.85%9.79%-6.51%-2.29%
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
1.42%6.47%6.11%7.07%-2.09%0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NTIIX and GMODX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.52

The correlation between NTIIX and GMODX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTIIX vs. GMODX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTIIX
NTIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NTIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NTIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GMODX
GMODX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMODX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GMODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMODX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) and GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTIIXGMODXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.68

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

6.43

-5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

26.64

-25.03

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the GMODX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTIIX and GMODX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than GMODX's maximum drawdown of -8.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTIIX and GMODX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTIIXGMODXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-8.79%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-0.65%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

-4.97%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.04%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-0.69%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.16%

+1.42%

Volatility

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) is 0.16%, while GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX) has a volatility of 0.33%. This indicates that NTIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMODX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTIIXGMODXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

0.33%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

0.99%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

1.32%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

3.83%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

3.04%

+1.87%

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GMODX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTIIX vs. GMODX - Dividend Comparison

NTIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than GMODX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
4.56%4.99%5.28%6.17%5.44%2.10%4.15%5.69%4.35%2.66%2.55%1.71%
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.83%4.07%4.24%3.85%1.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTIIX and GMODX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMODX has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to NTIIX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTIIX dropped -12.35% vs GMODX's -8.79%.

GMODX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTIIX and GMODX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer