PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTIIX vs. SCFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTIIX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCFZX's 2.28% return.


NTIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
10Y*

SCFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.28%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.88%2.16%-0.85%9.79%-6.51%-2.29%
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
2.28%5.75%9.41%8.67%-0.84%0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NTIIX and SCFZX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTIIX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTIIX
NTIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NTIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NTIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SCFZX
SCFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SCFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTIIXSCFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-17.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

7.34

-6.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

19.66

-18.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

69.67

-67.44

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SCFZX Sharpe Ratio of 4.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTIIX and SCFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum SCFZX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTIIX and SCFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTIIXSCFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-17.20%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-0.31%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

-0.93%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

0.00%

-3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-1.06%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.09%

+1.36%

Volatility

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) is 0.16%, while PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that NTIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTIIXSCFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

0.42%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

1.03%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

1.49%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

1.90%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

3.33%

+1.63%

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison

NTIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than SCFZX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.27%4.07%4.24%3.85%1.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
5.08%5.25%6.55%5.58%4.97%2.56%3.08%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTIIX and SCFZX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCFZX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to NTIIX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTIIX dropped -12.35% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.

SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTIIX and SCFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer