NTIIX vs. SCFZX
NTIIX (Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund) and SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, NTIIX returned 3.43%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for SCFZX. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NTIIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SCFZX.
Performance
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTIIX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCFZX's 2.71% return.
NTIIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.21%
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTIIX Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.55% | 2.16% | -0.85% | 9.79% | -6.51% | -2.29% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.71% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTIIX and SCFZX is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTIIX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank
NTIIX
SCFZX
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTIIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -17.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 7.19 | -6.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 19.16 | -18.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 67.68 | -66.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum SCFZX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTIIX and SCFZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTIIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -17.20% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -0.31% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -0.93% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | 0.00% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -1.04% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 0.09% | +1.49% |
Volatility
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.16% compared to PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) at 0.15%. This indicates that NTIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTIIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.15% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 1.02% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 1.47% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 1.91% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 3.31% | +1.60% |
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTIIX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison
NTIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than SCFZX's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTIIX Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.83% | 4.07% | 4.24% | 3.85% | 1.63% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 4.61% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTIIX and SCFZX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTIIX has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to SCFZX (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTIIX dropped -12.35% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTIIX and SCFZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer