PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIBX vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (RPIBX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIBX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.88% return.


RPIBX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
1.17%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-2.75%
10Y*
-0.13%

BNDW

1D
0.15%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.88%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RPIBX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund
-1.32%11.74%-4.31%7.35%-20.72%-7.18%11.51%6.67%0.71%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
0.88%5.02%2.42%7.18%-12.88%-2.10%6.22%8.37%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIBX and BNDW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.54

The correlation between RPIBX and BNDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIBX vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIBX
RPIBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RPIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (RPIBX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIBXBNDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.17

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.20

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

3.24

-2.55

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIBX and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIBX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIBX and BNDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIBXBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-17.22%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-2.70%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.19%

-4.27%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-16.93%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.15%

-1.08%

-16.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-4.95%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.00%

+0.88%

Volatility

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (RPIBX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 0.92%. This indicates that RPIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIBXBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.92%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.80%

2.70%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

3.35%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

5.22%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.21%

4.89%

+2.32%

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIBX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIBX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

RPIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than BNDW's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.19%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RPIBX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund
4.92%4.80%4.06%2.68%1.37%1.90%1.27%1.99%2.05%1.89%1.81%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIBX and BNDW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPIBX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to BNDW (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIBX dropped -33.80% vs BNDW's -17.22%.

BNDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIBX and BNDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer