RPHS vs. IBID
RPHS (Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPHS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Regents Park, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RPHS is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, RPHS returned 19.53% vs 4.83% for IBID. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPHS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
RPHS vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.
RPHS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 19.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPHS vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | 6.79% | 11.74% | 17.84% | 5.82% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.46% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPHS and IBID is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.00 |
The correlation between RPHS and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPHS vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
RPHS
IBID
RPHS vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPHS | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.94 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 13.33 | -10.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 39.52 | -29.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPHS | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 3.91 | -2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 2.56 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
RPHS vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPHS | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.77% | -1.28% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -0.36% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -0.22% | -5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.12% | +1.82% |
Volatility
RPHS vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that RPHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPHS | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 0.32% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 0.80% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 1.25% | +9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 2.25% | +9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 2.25% | +9.12% |
RPHS vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPHS vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%, more than IBID's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.66% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | 10.42% | 11.13% | 3.68% | 5.23% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPHS and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPHS has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHS dropped -15.77% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, RPHS leads with 19.53% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RPHS has performed better with a 19.53% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RPHS.
RPHS has the higher dividend yield at 10.42%, compared with 3.66% for IBID.
RPHS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RPHS and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPHS and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer