PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPHS vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RPHS vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RPHS vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


RPHS

1D
2.04%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-2.81%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPHS vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RPHS vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS
RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPHSDWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

RPHS vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPHSDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

Dividends

RPHS vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
RPHS
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF
11.69%11.13%3.68%5.23%1.29%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RPHSDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

0.00%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

0.00%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

0.00%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

Volatility

RPHS vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RPHSDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

0.00%

+11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.44%

0.00%

+11.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.44%

0.00%

+11.44%