RPHS vs. AVMA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RPHS (Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RPHS returned 15.90% vs 22.59% for AVMA. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPHS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.

Performance

RPHS vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.12% return.

RPHS

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 3.99%
• 6M: 3.78%
• 1Y: 15.90%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVMA

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 6M: 9.66%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHS vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	3.99%	11.74%	17.84%	6.91%
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.12%	16.72%	10.01%	8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RPHS and AVMA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.77

The correlation between RPHS and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPHS vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS

RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 46
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 79
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPHS	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.41	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.44	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.45	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	3.54	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	14.86	-6.91

RPHS vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPHS and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and AVMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHS	AVMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.51%	-11.81%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-6.40%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-1.21%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-1.54%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.52%	+0.48%

Volatility

RPHS vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) at 3.43%. This indicates that RPHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPHS	AVMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	3.43%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	7.61%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	9.41%	+1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.45%	10.36%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.45%	10.36%	+1.09%

RPHS vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPHS vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than AVMA's 3.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	3.03%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%	0.00%
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	10.70%	11.13%	3.68%	5.23%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPHS and AVMA in my portfolio?

RPHS and AVMA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPHS or AVMA?

RPHS has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to AVMA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHS dropped -16.51% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

Which ETF is better, RPHS or AVMA?

On 1-year performance, AVMA leads with 22.59% vs 15.90% for RPHS. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPHS or AVMA?

Over the 1-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPHS or AVMA?

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RPHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPHS or AVMA?

RPHS has the higher dividend yield at 10.70%, compared with 3.03% for AVMA.

What is the main difference between RPHS and AVMA?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RPHS and 0.21% for AVMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.