RPEAX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPEAX (Davis Opportunity Fund) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RPEAX returned 13.19%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPEAX charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Opportunity Fund (RPEAX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPEAX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than MUHLX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RPEAX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 13.19%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.

RPEAX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 13.25%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 32.69%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 13.66%
• 10Y*: 13.19%

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 23.73%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPEAX Davis Opportunity Fund	13.25%	21.86%	32.82%	22.21%	-14.12%	24.92%	12.78%	25.06%	-23.66%	23.09%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	11.53%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RPEAX and MUHLX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995	0.82

The correlation between RPEAX and MUHLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPEAX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPEAX

RPEAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
RPEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RPEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RPEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RPEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RPEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Opportunity Fund (RPEAX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPEAX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.76	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	2.40	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.31	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	2.40	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	9.10	+2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPEAX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPEAX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.76	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.73	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.63	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.52	+0.05

Drawdowns

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPEAX drawdown since its inception was -59.71%, roughly equal to the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPEAX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPEAX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.71%	-62.05%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-10.23%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.44%	-18.63%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.03%	-18.63%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.78%	-40.85%	+1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.55%	+3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.48%	-10.77%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	2.69%	+0.09%

Volatility

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Opportunity Fund (RPEAX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 3.13% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPEAX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	3.17%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	10.95%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	13.98%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.53%	14.62%	+9.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.75%	17.05%	+4.70%

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPEAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPEAX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

RPEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.28%, more than MUHLX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	2.99%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%
RPEAX Davis Opportunity Fund	12.28%	13.91%	33.00%	6.17%	8.47%	9.23%	2.88%	4.86%	0.64%	2.70%	2.44%	21.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPEAX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

RPEAX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPEAX or MUHLX?

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to RPEAX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPEAX dropped -59.71% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.