RPAR vs. SFYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while SFYX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. RPAR is actively managed, while SFYX is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFYX.

Performance

RPAR vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RPAR

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.10%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: 9.22%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: —

SFYX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	7.53%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	7.56%	19.40%	0.11%
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	5.66%	14.25%	14.45%	17.70%	-22.88%	18.89%	17.63%	2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and SFYX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019	0.48

The correlation between RPAR and SFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPAR vs. SFYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPAR	SFYX
Financial Services	35.9%	15.9%
Basic Materials	6.4%	3.2%
Energy	5.9%	4.5%
Healthcare	5.1%	12.1%
Communication Services	4.9%	4.5%
Industrials	2.1%	20.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	3.0%
Utilities	0.2%	2.2%
Technology	0.1%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	9.9%
Real Estate	-0.0%	6.4%

Return for Risk

RPAR vs. SFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 57
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPAR	SFYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.71	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPAR	SFYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RPAR	SFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPAR	SFYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.20%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	—	—

RPAR vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPAR vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SFYX's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.07%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	1.36%	1.44%	1.25%	1.51%	1.56%	0.90%	1.16%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPAR and SFYX in my portfolio?

RPAR and SFYX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RPAR or SFYX?

On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPAR or SFYX?

SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPAR or SFYX?

RPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.36% for SFYX.

What is the main difference between RPAR and SFYX?

RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SFYX is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.00% for SFYX.